Rand's Supreme Court of Canada Decisions by Subject
With the generous support of the New Brunswick Law Foundation, this subject matter index of the Rand jurisprudence was prepared by Michelle Brun, LL.B. in June 2001.
Administrative Law
British Columbia (Minister of Agriculture) v Canadian National Ry Co, [1959] SCR 229.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
North-west Line Elevators Association v Canadian Pacific Ry and Canadian National Ry, [1959] SCR 239.
Rand delivered for the court.
Aeronautics
Cairney v Mac Queen, [1956] SCR 555.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Aliens
Canada (Secretary of State) v Rothschild, [1946] SCR 403.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Kieffer v Canada (Secretary of State), [1953] 2 SCR 198.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada (AG) v Brent, [1956] SCR 318.
Rand concurred in the result.
Application of Civil Code
Alain v Hardy, [1951] SCR 540.
Rand concurred in the result.
Barristers & Soliciters
Boileau v Quebec (AG), [1957] SCR 463.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Commercial Law
Spun Rock Wools Ltd v Fiberglas Canada Ltd et al, [1943] SCR 547.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Greenbank v National Supply Co Ltd et al, [1944] SCR 59.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Williams, [1944] SCR 226.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
J. Christin & Cie Ltee v Piette, [1944] SCR 308.
Rand concurred in the result.
Braun v Canada (Custodian), [1944] SCR 339.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Dominion Engineering Co Ltd, [1944] SCR 371.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lamarre v Bigras, [1945] SCR 82.
Rand concurred in the result.
Gatineau Power Co v Crown Life Insurance Co, [1945] SCR 655.
Rand delivered for the court.
Battle Pharmaceuticals v British Drug Houses Ltd, [1946] SCR 50.
Kerwin delivered decision for the court.
International Power Co v McMaster University, [1946] SCR 178.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Guillot v LeFaivre, [1946] SCR 335.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Secretary of State) v Rothschild, [1946] SCR 403.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Cie du Pont Plessis-Bélair v Québec (AG), [1946] SCR 473.
Rand concurred in the result.
Weddel Ltd v Canada, [1946] SCR 499.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Barnes v Saskatwenan Co-operative Wheat Producers Ltd, [1947] SCR 241.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Niles v Lake, [1947] SCR 291.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Asconi Building Corporation and Vermette v Vocisano, [1947] SCR 358.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Keyes v Royal Bank of Canada, [1947] SCR 377.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Wandscheer v Sicard Ltd, [1948] SCR 1.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Racette, [1948] SCR 28.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Commissioner of Patents) v Winthrop Chemical Co Inc, [1948] SCR 46.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Oxford Paper Company v Inverness (county), [1948] SCR 115.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (AG) v Gas and Oil Products Ltd, [1948] SCR 215.
Rand concurred in the result.
Brookfield Estate (Re), [1949] SCR 329.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Registrar of Trade Marks) v GA Hardie & Co Ltd, [1949] SCR 485.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Irving Air Chute Inc, [1949] SCR 613.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
General Motors Corp v Bellow, [1949] SCR 678.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canadian Pacific Railway v Alberta, [1950] SCR 25.
Rand concurred in the result.
Noranda Mines Ltd v Minerals Separation North American Corp, [1950] SCR 36.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v TE McCool Ltd, [1950] SCR 80.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Sun Life Co of Canada v Montreal (city), [1950] SCR 220.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dastous v Matthews-Wells Ltd, [1950] SCR 261.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Louis F. Rothschild and Co v Duffield, [1950] SCR 495.
Rand concurred in the result.
Yeats v Central Mortgage and Housing Corp, [1950] SCR 513.
Rand concurred in the result.
Home Assurance Co of Canada (Liquidator of) (Re), [1950] SCR 578.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Home Assurance Co of Canada (Liquidator of) v Contributories of Home Assurance Co of Canada, [1950] SCR 591.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Composers, Authors and Publishers Association, Ltd v Western Fair Association, [1951] SCR 596.
Rand concurred in the result..
Industrial Acceptance Corporation Ltd v LaLonde, [1952] 2 SCR 109.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Atlas Diesel Engines Co Ltd v McLeod Engines Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 122.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Composers, Authors & Publishers Association of Canada Ltd v Kiwanis Club of West Toronto, [1953] 2 SCR 111.
Rand delivered for the court.
Gordon v Connors, [1953] 2 SCR 127.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Muzak Corporation v Composers, Authors & Publishers Association of Canada Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 182.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Rathie v Montreal Trust Company, [1953] 2 SCR 204.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Zwicker v Turnbull Estate, [1953] 2 SCR 438.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Industrial Acceptance Corp v Couture, [1954] SCR 34.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada v Mendelson, [1954] SCRv 422.
Rand concurred in the result.
Maple Leaf Broadcasting Co Ltd v Composers, Authors & Publishers Association of Canada Ltd, [1954] SCR 624.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Hoffman-LaRoche & Co Ltd v Canada (Commissioner of Patents), [1955] SCR 415.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
System Theatre Operating Co Ltd v Pulos, [1955] SCR 448.
Rand concurred in the result.
Scully Signal Co v York Machine Co Ltd, [1955] SCR 518.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
R v Francis, [1956] SCR 618.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Traders Finance Corp Ltd v Williams, [1956] SCR 694.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Waters Estate (Re), [1956] SCR 889.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Hardy Estate (Re), [1956] SCR 906.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Racine v Barry, [1957] SCR 92.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Ghimpelman v Bercovici, [1957] SCR 128.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Lemire v Pelchat, [1957] SCR 823.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Midcom Oil & Gas Ltd v New British Dominion Oil Co Ltd, [1958] SCR 315.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Earl F Wakefield Co v Oil City Petroleums Ltd (Leduc), [1958] SCR 361.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canadian Acceptance Corporation Ltd v Contractors Supplies Ltd (Liquidator of), [1958] SCR 546.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Leo Perreault Ltee v Tessier, [1958] SCR 698.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Parke, Davis & Co v Fine Chemicals of Canada Ltd, [1959] SCR 219.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canadian Bank of Commerce v McAvity & Sons Ltd, [1959] SCR 479.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Composers, Authors, Publishers Association Co v Siegel Distributing Co Ltd, [1959] SCR 489.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Conflicts of Law
Laane v Estonian Cargo & Passenger SS Line, [1949] SCR 530.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Constitutional Law
Reference re Exemption of United States Forces from Proceedings in Canadian Criminal Courts, [1943] SCR 483.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Ontario Boy’s Wear Ltd v Ontario (Advisory Committee), [1944] SCR 351.
Kerwin delivered judgment for the court.
Quebec Railway Light and Power Co v Beauport (Town), [1945] SCR 16.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (AG) v Western Higbie and Albion Investments Ltd, [1945] SCR 385.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Stargoff, [1945] SCR 526.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Orders in Council in Relation to Persons of the Japanese Race, [1946] SCR 248.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Validity of S 6 of Farm Security Act, 1944, [1947] SCR 394.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Minimum Wage Act (Saskatchewan), [1948] SCR 248.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canadian Pacific Ry Co v British Columbia (AG), [1948] SCR 373.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Esquimalt and Nanaimo Ry Co v British Columbia (AG), [1948] SCR 403.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Validity of s 5(a) of Dairy Industry Act (Canada), (Margarine case), [1949] SCR 1.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Boudreau, [1949] SCR 262.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Brookfield Estate (Re), [1949] SCR 329.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Wartime Leasehold Regulations, [1950] SCR 124.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Bowater’s Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd, [1950] SCR 608.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Nova Scotia (AG) v Canada (AG), [1951] SCR 31.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Wheat Board) v Nolan, [1951] SCR 81.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Winner v S.M.T. (Eastern Ltd), [1951] SCR 887.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canadian Pacific Ry v Saskatchewan (AG), [1952] 2 SCR 231.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
PEI (Potato Marketing Board) v HB Willis Inc, [1952] 2 SCR 392.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Western Minerals Ltd et al v Gaumont, [1953] 1 SCR 345.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada v Industrial Acceptance Corporation Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 273.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Saumur v Quebec (AG), [1953] 2 SCR 299.
Validity of municipal by-law. Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Johnson v Alberta (AG), [1954] SCR 127.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Deware, [1954] SCR 182.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Campbell-Bennett Ltd v Comstock Midwestern Ltd, [1954] SCR 207.
Rand delivered for the majority.
R v Boucher, [1955] SCR 16.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Reference re Validity and Applicability of the Industrial Relations and Disputes Investigation Act, [1955] SCR 529.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Henry Birks & Sons (Montreal) Ltd v Montreal (city), [1955] SCR 799.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canadian Bankers Association v Saskatchewan (AG), [1956] SCR 31.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Ontario (AG) v Scott, [1956] SCR 137.
Rand delivered for the majority.
R v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co of Canada Ltd, [1956] SCR 303.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Reference Re Farm Products Marketing Act (Ontario), [1957] SCR 198.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Switzman v Elbing (Quebec), [1957] SCR 285.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (AG) v Canadian Pacific Ry and Canadian National Ry, [1958] SCR 285.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Dupont v Inglis, [1958] SCR 533.
Constitutional law: Creation of special tribunal. Rand delivered for the court.
Reference re validity of s 92(4) of the Vehicle Act, 1957 (Saskatchewan), [1958] SCR 608.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Murphy v Canadian Pacific Ry Co, [1958] SCR 626.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Reference re Municipal Act (Manitoba) v Canadian Pacific Ry, [1958] SCR 744.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Vic Restaurant Inc v Montreal (city), [1959] SCR 58.
Rand concurred in the result.
Roncarelli v Duplessis, [1959] SCR 121
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v Ontario (AG), [1959] SCR 188.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Lord’s Day Alliance of Canada v British Columbia, [1959] SCR 497.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Contract Law
Greenbank v National Supply Co Ltd, [1944] SCR 59.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Pacific Great Eastern Ry Co v Bridge River Power Co Ltd, [1944] SCR 196.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion as to part of counterclaim.
Petrie v Petrie Estates, [1944] SCR 246.
Rand delivered dissent.
J Christin & Cie Ltee v Piette, [1944] SCR 308.
Taschereau delivered for the court.
Fleming v Milner Estate, [1944] SCR 360.
Rand delivered concurring opinion.
Consumers Cordage Co Ltd v St Gabriel Land and Hydraulic Co Ltd, [1945] SCR 159.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Aga Heat (Canada) Ltd v Brockville Hotel Co, [1945] SCR 184.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Breault v Tremblay, [1945] SCR 217.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Hoefle v Bongard & Company, [1945] SCR 360.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
WA Betchel Company v Stevenson & Van Humbeck Sawmill, [1945] SCR 652.
Rand delivered for the court.
Mission Sawmills v Gill Bros, [1945] SCR 766.
Rand concurred in the result.
Eansor v Eansor, [1946] SCR 54.
Rand concurred in the result.
Union Packing Co Ltd v Canada, [1946] SCR 456.
Rand concurred in the result.
Calmusky v Karaloff, [1947] SCR 110.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Cemco Electrical manufacturing Company Ltd v Van Snellenberg , [1947] SCR 121.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Barnes v Saskatchewan Co-operative Wheat Producers Ltd, [1947] SCR 241.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Niles v Lake, [1947] SCR 291.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Western Dominion Coal Mines Ltd v Canada, [1947] SCR 313.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dionne v Madawaska Co, [1947] SCR 498.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Commercial Life Assurance Co v Drever, [1948] SCR 306.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Hanson v Cameron, [1949] SCR 101.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Waugh v Pioneer Logging Co Ltd, [1949] SCR 299.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Hôpital St-Luc v Beauchamp, [1950] 3.
Rand concurred in the result.
Paoli v Vulcan Iron Works Ltd, [1950] 114.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Yeats v Central Mortgage and Housing Corp, [1950] SCR 513.
Rand concurred in the result..
Canada v Canada Steamship Lines et al, [1950] SCR 532.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lethbridge Collieries Ltd v Canada, [1951] SCR 139.
Rand concurred in the result.
Picbell Ltd v Pickford & Black Ltd, [1951] SCR 757.
Rand delivered for majority.
Lortie v Bouchard, [1952] 1 SCR 508.
Rand concurred with Taschereau.
Canadian Atlas Diesel Engines Co Ltd v McLeod Engines Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 122.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Cie d’Entrepreneurs en Construction Ltee v Simard, [1952] 2 SCR444.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canadian Indemnity Company v Andrews & George Co Ltd, [1953] 1 SCR 19.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Harvey v Perry, [1953] 1 SCR 233.
Rand concurred in the result.
Salmon River Logging Company Ltd v Burt, [1953] 2 SCR 117.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Rathie v Montreal Trust Company, [1953] 2 SCR 204.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Pauze v Gauvin, [1954] SCR 15.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Dominion Taxicab Association v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1954] SCR 82.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Toronto (city) v Canada Permanent Mortgage Corp, [1954] SCR 576.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Rocky Mountain School Division No 15 v Atlas Lumber Co Ltd , [1954] SCR
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Deglman v Brunet Estate, [1954] SCR 725.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Oshawa (city) v Brennan Paving Co Ltd, [1955] SCR 76.
Rand concurred in the result.
Farah v Barki, [1955] SCR 107.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Duchesneau v Cook, [1955] SCR 207.
Rand concurred with the result.
Mineapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co Ltd v Empire Brass Manufacturing Co Ltd, [1955] SCR 694.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Bellavance v Orange Crush Ltd and Kik Co, [1955] SCR 706.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
B VD Co Ltd v Canada, [1955] SCR 787.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Dawson v Helicopter Exploration Co Ltd, [1955] SCR 868.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Scharfenberg v Kortes, [1956] SCR 273. Contract law:
Rand delivered for the majority.
Cie JA Gosselin Ltee v Peloquin, [1957] SCR 15.
Rand concurred in the result.
Lambert v Levis Automobiles Inc, [1957] SCR 621.
Rand concurred in the result.
Gray v Kerslake, [1958] SCR 3.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Westmount (city) v Montreal Transportation Commission, [1958] SCR 65.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Outremont (city) v Montreal Transportation Commission, [1958] SCR 75.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Hevesy Corporation v Sauve, [1958] SCR 113.
Rand concurred in the result.
Midcom Oil & Gas Ltd v New British Dominion Oil Co Ltd, [1958] SCR 315.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Earl F Wakefield Co v Oil City Petroleums Ltd (Leduc), [1958] SCR 361.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Mason v Freedman, [1958] SCR 483.
Rand concurred in the result.
Calvan Consolidated Oil and Gas Co Ltd v ME Manning, [1959] SCR 253.
Rand concurred in the result.
Anticosti Shipping Co v St-Amand, [1959] SCR 372.
Rand delivered for the court.
Canadian Bank of Commerce v McAvity & Sons Ltd, [1959] SCR 479.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Criminal Law
R v Beatty, [1944] SCR 73.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Deur, [1944] SCR 435.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Ouvrard v Quebec Paper Box Company Ltd, [1945] SCR 1.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Mihalachan, [1945] SCR 9.
Rand concurred in the result.
Ottawa Electric Ry Co v Ottawa (City), [1945] SCR 105.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v McIntyre, [1945] SCR 134.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v East Crest Oil Company Ltd, [1945] SCR 191.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Wright, [1945] SCR 319.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Schmidt, [1945] SCR 438.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Storgoff, [1945] SCR 526.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Savard, [1946] SCR 20.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v MacDonald, [1947] SCR 90.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Tass, [1947] SCR 103.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Deacon, [1947] SCR 531.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Northey, [1948] SCR 135.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Lopatinsky, [1948] SCR 220.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Schmidt, [1948] SCR 333.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Paige, [1948] SCR 349.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Blais, [1948] SCR 369.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Vescio, [1949] SCR 139.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Morabito, [1949] SCR 172.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Boudreau, [1949] SCR 262.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Nykolyn, [1949] SCR 392.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Grant, [1949] SCR 647.
Rand concurred with Kerwin.
R v Roe, [1949] SCR 652.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Cullen, [1949] SCR 658.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Webb v Webb, [1950] SCR 381.
Rand concurred in the result.
Frey v Fedoruk, [1950] SCR 517.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Latour, [1951] SCR 19.
Rand concurred in the result..
R v Lizotte, [1951] SCR 115.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Boucher, [1951] SCR 265.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Robinson, [1951] SCR 522.
Rand concurred with Locke.
R v Murakami, [1951] SCR 801.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Clay, [1952] 1 SCR 170.
Rand concurred with Kellock.
R v Lemay, [1952] 1 SCR 232.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v Malanik, [1952] 2 SCR 355.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Azoulay, [1952] 2 SCR 495.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
R v Kelsey, [1953] 1 SCR 220.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Lizotte, [1953] 1 SCR 411.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Watts, [1953] 1 SCR 505.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Finestone, [1953] 2 SCR 107.
Rand delivered for the court.
Canada v Industrial Acceptance Corporation Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 273.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Binet, [1954] SCR 52.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Regent Vending Machines Ltd v Alberta Vending Machines Ltd, [1954] SCR 98.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Snider, [1954] SCR 479.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Shymkowich, [1954] SCR 606.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v O’Brien, [1954] SCR 666.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Boucher, [1955] SCR 16.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Archer, [1955] SCR 33.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Herbert, [1955] SCR 120.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Kuzmack, [1955] SCR 292.
Rand concurred in the result.
Klein v Bell, [1955] SCR 309.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Tripodi, [1955] SCR 438.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Chaput v Romain, [1955] SCR 834.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Cathro, [1956] SCR 101.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Bew, [1956] SCR 124.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Reference re Coffin, [1956] SCR 191.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Suchard, [1956] SCR 425.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Harder, [1956] SCR 489.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Scullion v Canadian Breweries Transport Ltd, [1956] SCR 512.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Gagnon, [1956] SCR 635.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Rees, [1956] SCR 640.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Bradley, [1956] SCR 723.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
R v Parkes, [1956] SCR 768.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Isseman, [1956] SCR 798.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Fitton, [1956] SCR 958.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Kirkland, [1957] SCR 3.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Carey, [1957] SCR 266.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Howard Smith Paper Mills Ltd, [1957] SCR 403.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Beaver, [1957] SCR 531.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Neil, [1957] SCR 685.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Larson, [1958] SCR 513.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
R v Lattoni, [1958] SCR 603.
Rand concurred in the result.
Crown
Canada v Northumberland Ferries Ltd, [1945] SCR 458.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Cie du Pont Plessis-Bélair v Quebec (AG), [1946] SCR 473.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada (AG) v Jackson, [1946] SCR 489.
Rand delivered decision for the majority.
Western Dominion Coal Mines Ltd v Canada, [1947] SCR 313.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Richardson, [1948] SCR 57.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Bureau, [1949] SCR 367.
Rand concurred in the result.
Miller v Canada, [1950] SCR 168.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Canada Steamship Lines Ltd, [1950] SCR 532.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Sauvageau v Canada, [1950] SCR 664.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Joy Oil Co Ltd v Canada, [1951] SCR 624.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Spence, [1952] 2 SCR 517.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Robillard v Quebec (Commission Hydro Electrique), [1954] SCR 695.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
BVD Co Ltd v Canada, [1955] SCR 787.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Davidson v Canada, [1956] SCR 252.
Rand concurred in the result.
British Columbia (AG) v Deeks Sand & Gravel Co Ltd, [1956] SCR 336.
Rand concurred in the result.
Samson v Canada, [1957] SCR 832.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Perepelytz v Ontario (Minister of highways), [1958] SCR 161.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Roncarelli v Duplessis, [1959] SCR 121
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v Ontario (AG), [1959] SCR 188.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Disciplinary Proceedings
R v White, [1956] SCR 154.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Employment Law
Ching v Canadian Pacific Railway Company, [1943] SCR 451.
Rand for the court.
McLeod v Sweezey, [1944] SCR 111.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Maurice Pollack Ltd v Comité paritaire du Commerce de détail à Quebec, [1946] SCR 343.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (AG) v Jackson, [1946] SCR 489.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Anthony, [1946] SCR 569.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Cemco Electrical manufacturing Company Ltd v Snellenberg, [1947] SCR 121.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Paoli v Vulcan Iron Works Ltd, [1950] SCR 114.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Gilmour v Mossop, [1951] SCR 815.
Rand concurred with Locke.
New Brunswick (Workers/Workmen’s Compensation Board) v Canadian Pacific Ry, [1952] 2 SCR 359.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Cox (Re), [1953] 1 SCR 94.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Samson v Canada, [1957] SCR 832.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Brotherhoods of Ry Employees v NY Central RR Co, [1958] SCR 519.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Andrews v Chaput, [1959] SCR 7.
Rand concurred in the result.
Expropriation
Canada v Halin, [1944] SCR 119.
Rand concurred in the result.
Irving Oil Company Ltd v Canada, [1946] SCR 551.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Diggon-Hibben Ltd v Canada, [1949] SCR 712.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Woods Manufacturing Co Ltd v Canada, [1951] SCR 504.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Jasmin, [1954] SCR 410.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Frei, [1956] SCR 467.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
North York (Township)Board of Education v Village Developments Ltd, [1956] SCR 539.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Jacques-Cartier (ville) v Lamarre, [1958] SCR 108.
Rand concurred in the result.
Bellerose v Quebec, [1958] SCR 261.
Rand concurred in the result.
Family Law
Fortier v Miller, [1943] SCR 470.
Rand concurred in the result..
G v G, [1943] SCR 527.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Cole v Cole, [1944] SCR 166.
Rand concurred in the result.
Saskatoon (city) v Shaw, [1945] SCR 42.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Johnson v Johnson, [1945] SCR 455.
Rand concurred in the result.
Stirling Woollens & Silks Co Ltd v Lashinsky, [1945] SCR 762.
Rand concurred in the result.
Pahara v Pahara, [1946] SCR 89.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Minaker v Minaker, [1949] SCR 397.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Martin v Duffell, [1950] SCR 737.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Maynard v Maynard, [1951] SCR 346.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Findlay v Findlay, [1952] 1 SCR 96.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Smith v Smith, [1952] 2 SCR 312.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Boykowych v Boykaowych, [1955] SCR 151.
Divorce, adultery, standard of proof. Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Carnochan v Carnochan, [1955] SCR 669.
Rand concurred in the result.
Clemens v Clemens Estate, [1956] SCR 286.
Rand concurred in the result.
Racine v Rousseau, [1956] SCR 470.
Rand concurred in the result.
Bickley v Bickley, [1957] SCR 329.
Rand concurred in the result.
Lunenburg (town) v Lunenburg (municipality), [1957] SCR 400.
Rand delivered for the court.
Hepton v Maat, [1957] SCR 606.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Helens v Densmore, [1957] SCR 768.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Agar v McNeilly, [1958] SCR 52.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Little v Little, [1958] SCR 566.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Immigration
Canada v Chai, [1954] SCR 10.
Rand concurred in the result.
Narine-Singh v Canada (AG), [1955] SCR 395.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada (AG) v Brent, [1956] SCR 318.
Rand concurred in the result.
Insurance
Travelers Indemnity Company v Powers, [1944] SCR 77.
Rand concurred in the result.
New York Life Insurance Company v Ross Estate, [1945] SCR 289.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Co v Maxim, [1946] SCR 604.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Adam v Ouellette, [1947] SCR 283.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Marcoux v Halifax Fire Insurance Co, [1948] SCR 278.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co v Abasand Oils Ltd, [1948] SCR 315.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Sherwin- Williams Co of Canada Ltd v Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co, [1950] SCR 187.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
World Marine & General Insurance Co Ltd v Leger, [1952] 2 SCR 3.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Indemnity Company v Andrews & George Co Ltd, [1953] 1 SCR 19.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Ellis v London-Canada Insurance Co, [1954] SCR 28.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Indemnity Insurance Co of North America v Excel Cleaning Service, [1954] SCR 169.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
General Security Insurance Co of Canada v Howard Sand & Gravel Co Ltd, [1954] SCR 785.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v Stone, [1955] SCR 627.
Rand for the majority.
Continental Casualty Co v Roberge, [1955] SCR 676.
Rand concurred in the result.
Northern Assurance Co Ltd v Brown, [1956] SCR 658.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Stevenson v Reliance Petroleum Ltd, [1956] SCR 936.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Firth v Western Life Assurance, [1957] SCR 428.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co v Bell, [1957] SCR 581.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Gray v Kerslake, [1958] SCR 3.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Union Marine & General Ins Co Ltd v Bodnorchuk, [1958] SCR 399.
Rand concurred in the result.
Irving Oil Co Ltd v Canadian General Insurance Co, [1958] SCR 590.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Chatham (Canton) v Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co Ltd, [1959] SCR 47.
Rand concurred in the result.
International Law
Reference re Exemption of United States Forces from Proceedings in Canadian Criminal Courts, [1943] SCR 483.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dessaulles v Republic of Polland, [1944] SCR 275.
Rand concurred in the result.
Pouliot v Cloutier, [1944] SCR 284.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lister v McAnulty, [1944] SCR 317.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Braun v Custodian, [1944] SCR 339.
Rand concurred in the result.
Laane v Estonian Cargo & Passenger SS Line, [1949] SCR 530.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Saint John (municipality) v Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation, [1958] SCR 263.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Judicial Sales
Keystone Shingles and Lumber Ltd v Royal Plate Glass & General Insurance Co, [1957] SCR 556.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Judgment & Orders
Stanley v Jardine Estate, [1952] 1 S.C.R 260.
Rand expresses no opinion
M Gordon & Son Ltd v Debly, [1956] SCR 522.
Rand delivered for the court.
Jury Trial
McRae v Eldridge, [1959] SCR 16.
Rand concurred in the result.
Labour Law
Le Comité Paritaire de L’Industrie de L’Imprimerie de Montreal et du District v Dominion Bland Book Company Ltd, [1944] SCR 213.
Rand concurred in the result.
Ontario Boy’s Wear Ltd v Ontario (Advisory Committee), [1944] SCR 351.
Rand concurred in the result.
Maurice Pollack Ltd v Comité paritaire du Commerce de détail à Quebec, [1946] SCR 343.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Newell v Barker, [1950] SCR 385.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Williams v Aristocratic Restaurants Ltd, [1951] SCR 762.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Poje v British Columbia (AG), [1953] 1 SCR
Rand concurred in the result.
Ontario (Labour Relations Board) (Re), [1953] 2 SCR 18.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
British Columbia (Labour Relational Board) v Canada Safeway Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 46.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Smith & Rhuland Ltd v Nova Scotia, [1953] 2 SCR 95.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Alliance des Professeurs Catholiques de Montreal v Quebec (Labour Relations Board), [1953] 2 SCR 140.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Szilard v Szasz, [1955] SCR 3.
Rand delivered for the court.
BC Hotels Employees’ Union, Local 260 v BC Hotels Association, [1955] SCR 222.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Kennedy v New Brunswick (Workmen’s Compensation Board), [1955] SCR 524.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Rossignol v Hart, [1956] SCR 314.
Rand delivered for the court.
Orchard v Tunney, [1957] SCR 436.
Rand delivered for the majority.
United Mine Workers of America, District No 26 v McKinnon, [1958] SCR 202.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
British Columbia (Labour Relations Board) v Traders’ Services Ltd, [1958] SCR 672.
Rand concurred in the result.
Marshall-Wells Company Ltd v RWDSU, local 454, [1956] SCR 511.
Rand concurred in the result.
Mortgage
Petrie v Petrie Estates, [1944] SCR 246.
Rand delivered dissent.
Fleming vMilner Estate, [1944] SCR 360.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Asconi Building Corp v Vocisano, [1947] SCR 358.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Shook Estate v Dickson Estate, [1948] SCR 539.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Hanson v Canada Trust Co, [1951] SCR 366.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Rosconi v Dubois et al, [1951] SCR 554.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Pew v Zink, [1953] 1 SCR 285.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Coupland Acceptance Ltd v Walsh, [1954] SCR 90.
Rand concurred in the result.
Hunt v Hunt, [1955] SCR 8.
Rand concurred in the result.
Municipal Law
Vancouver (City) v Canada (AG), [1944] SCR 23.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Clough v Shefford (County), [1944] SCR 280.
Rand concurred in the result.
Ottawa Electric Ry Co v Ottawa (City), [1945] SCR 105.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Kuchma v Tache (Rural Municipality), [1945] SCR 234.
Rand concurred in the result.
St-Vital (Rural Municipality) v Winnipeg (City), [1946] SCR 101.
Rand concurred with Kellock.
Central Jewish Institute v Toronto (city), [1948] SCR 101.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Auclair v Brownsburg (Village), [1948] SCR 478.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Long Branch (village) v Hogle, [1948] SCR 557.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
McConmey v Coaticook (city), [1950] SCR 487.
Rand concurred in the result.
Outremont (City) v Outremont (Municipality) Protestant School, [1952] 2 SCR 507.
Rand concurred in the result.
R v Bridge, [1953] 1 SCR 8.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Saumur v Quebec (AG), [1953] 2 SCR 299.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Toronto-St Catharines Transport Ltd v Toronto (city) and Canadian National Ry, [1954] SCR 61.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Toronto (city) v Canada Permanent Mortgage Corp, [1954] SCR 576.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Forest Lawn Cemetery Co v Barnaby (district), [1955] SCR 727.
Rand concurred in the result.
Scarborough (township) v Toronto (city), [1956] SCR 450.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Klassy Shoe Store v Montreal (city), [1957] SCR 12.
Rand concurred in the result.
Surrey (district) v British Columbia Electric Co Ltd, [1957] SCR 121.
Rand concurred in the result.
Markham (Township) v Langstaff Land Development Ltd, [1957] SCR 336.
delivered separate reasons for decision.
Toronto (metropolitan) v Forest Hill (village), [1957] SCR 569.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Etobicoke (township) Board of Education v Highbury Developments Ltd, [1958] SCR 197.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
London (city) v St. Thomas (city), [1958] SCR 249.
Rand concurred in the result.
Carriss v Buxton, [1958] SCR 441.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Reference re Municipal Act (Manitoba) v Canadian Pacific Ry, [1958] SCR 744.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Ste-Anne-du-Lac (village) v Hogue, [1959] SCR 38.
Rand concurred in the result.
Vic Restaurant Inc v Montreal (city), [1959] SCR 58.
Rand concurred in the result.
Physicians and Surgeons
Wilson v Swanson, [1956] SCR 804.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Sylvester v Crits, [1956] SCR 991.
Rand delivered for the court.
Professional Misconduct
Mehr v Law Society of Upper Canada, [1955] SCR 344.
Rand concurred in the result.
Property Law
Vancouver (city) v Canada (AG), [1944] SCR 23.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada v Halin, [1944] SCR 119.
Rand concurred in the result.
Cole v Cole, [1944] SCR 166.
Rand concurred in the result.
Jean v Gagnon, [1944] SCR 175.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Alberta (AG) v Withycombe Estate, [1945] SCR 267.
Rinfret delivered decision (Rand).
Johnson v Johnson, [1945] SCR 455.
Rand concurred in the result..
Stirling Woollens & Silks Co Ltd v Lashinsky, [1945] SCR 762.
Rand concurred in the result.
Bérubé v Cameron, [1946] SCR 74.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Pahara v Pahara, [1946] SCR 89.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Queen’s (county) v Cooper, [1946] SCR 584.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Auld v Scales, [1947] SCR 543.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister National Revenue) v National Trust Co Ltd, [1949] SCR 127.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
British Columbia v Bridge River Power Co Ltd, [1949] SCR 246.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Minaker v Minaker, [1949] SCR 397.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Plamondon v Dionne, [1949] SCR 522
Rand concurred in the result.
KVP Co Ltd v McKie, [1949] SCR 698.
Rand concurred in the result.
St. Ann’s Island Shooting and Fishing Club Ltd v Canada, [1950] SCR 211.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Randall v McLaughlin, [1950] SCR 291.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Noble v Alley, [1951] SCR 64.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Alberta (AG) v Huggard Assets Ltd, [1951] SCR 427.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Zusman v Tremblay, [1951] SCR 659.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Bathurst (Parish) Gloucester (County) Assessors (Re), [1951] SCR 872.
Rand delivered for majority.
Société Immobilière Maisonneuve Ltée. v Chevaliers de Maisonneuve, [1952] 2 SCR 456.
Rand concurred with Tachereau.
Dulac v Nadeau, [1953] 1 SCR 164.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Western Minerals Ltd et al v Gaumont, [1953] 1 SCR 345.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Manitoba (Registrar Land Titles, District Portage La Prairie) v Canadian Superior Oil of California Ltd, [1954] SCR 323.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Savage v Wilby, [1954] SCR 376.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Hager v United Sheet Metal Ltd, [1954] SCR 384.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Pacific Ry and Imperial Oil Ltd v Turta, [1954] SCR 427.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Duchesneau v Cook, [1955] SCR 207.
Rand concurred with the result.
Carnochan v Carnochan, [1955] SCR 669.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Construction Co Ltd v Beaver (Alberta) Lumber Ltd, [1955] SCR 682.
Rand concurred in the result.
Wardle v Manitoba Farm Loans Association, [1956] SCR 3.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
British Columbia (AG) v Deeks Sand & Gravel Co Ltd, [1956] SCR 336.
Rand concurred in the result.
Racine v Rousseau, [1956] SCR 470.
Rand concurred in the result.
British Columbia (AG) v Neilson, [1956] SCR 819.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Roberts v Canada, [1957] SCR 28.
Rand concurred in the result.
Gagetown Lumber Co Ltd v Canada, [1957] SCR 44.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Berkheiser v Berkheiser, [1957] SCR 387.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Prudential Trust Co Ltd v Saskatchewan (Registrar land, Registration District Humboldt), [1957] SCR 658.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Côté v Sternlieb,[1958] SCR 121.
Rand concurred in the result.
Mason v Freedman,[1958] SCR 483.
Rand concurred in the result.
Wright v Long Branch (village), [1959] SCR 418.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Faubert v Poirier, [1959] SCR 459.
Rand concurred in the result.
Aubertin v Montreal (cité), [1957] SCR 643.
Rand concurred in the result.
Meduk v Soja, [1958] SCR 167.
Rand concurred in the result.
Revenues
Lumbers v Minister of National Revenue, [1944] 167.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Dominion Engineering Co Ltd, [1944] SCR 371.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Thomson v Minister of National Revenue, [1946] SCR 209.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Mahaffy v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1946] SCR 450.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dominion Telegraph Securities Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1947] SCR 45.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Sterling Royalties Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1947] SCR 79.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Burns Estate v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1947] SCR 132.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion in part.
DR Fraser and Company Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1947] SCR 157.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Wm Wrigley Jr Co Ltd v Manitoba (treasurer), [1947] SCR 431.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canada (AG) v Gas and Oil Products Ltd, [1948] SCR 215.
Rand concurred in the result.
Argue v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1948] SCR 467.
Rand concurred in the result.
Johnston v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1948] SCR 486.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Great Western Garment Co Ltd, [1948] SCR 585.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister National Revenue) v National Trust Co Ltd, [1949] SCR 127.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Bennett and White Construction Co Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1949] SCR 287.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Bureau, [1949] SCR 367.
Rand concurred in the result.
Steed Estate (Re), [1949] SCR 453.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Borden Company Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1949] SCR 479.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Bagg v Canada (Minister of Nationional Revenue), [1949] SCR 574.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Fleet Estate (Re), [1949] SCR 727.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v TE McCool Ltd, [1950] SCR 80.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Joggins Coal Company Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1950] SCR 470.
Rand concurred in the result.
Blackwell v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1951] SCR 419.
Rand concurred in the result.
Wilder v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1952] 1 SCR 123.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Bouck v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1952] 2 SCR 17.
Rand concurred in the result.
Robson v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1952] 2 SCR 223.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Wain-Town Gas and Oil Company Ltd, [1952] SCR 377.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Goldman v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1953] 1 SCR 211.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Noak v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1953] 2 SCR 136.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Independence Founders Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 389.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Spruce Falls Powers & Paper Co, [1953] 2 SCR 407.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Stock Exchange Building Corp Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1955] SCR 235.
Rand concurred with the result.
Wilson v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1955] SCR 352.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Okalta Oils Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1955] SCR 824.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Trans-Canada Investment Corp Ltd, [1956] SCR 49.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Consolidated Glass Ltd, [1957] SCR 167.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Tip Top Taylors Ltd v Canada (Ministers of National Revenues), [1957] SCR 703.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada v Laboratoires Marois Ltee, [1958] SCR 425.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada Safeway Ltd v Canada (Ministers of National Revenues), [1957] SCR 717.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Dominion Engineering Works Ltd v Canada (Deputy Minister of National Revenues), [1958] SCR 652.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
School Law
St-Adelphe (Municipality de la Paroisse) Commissaires d’Ecoles v Charest, [1944] SCR 391.
Rand concurred in the result.
Congrégation du Très Saint Rédempteur v Aylmer (Town), [1945] SCR 685.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
McGonegal v Gray, [1952] 2 SCR 274.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Shipping
Hochelaga Shipping & Towing Co Ltd v Canada, [1944] SCR 138.
Rand concurred in the result.
Dominion Glass Company Limited v Anlo Indian (The), [1944] SCR 409.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
SS “Richelieu” (The) v Cie de Navigatio Saguenay et Lac St-Jean Ltee, [1945] SCR 659.
Rand concurred in the result..
Canada v Saint John Tug Boat Co Ltd, [1946] SCR 466.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
SS Fanad Head (the) v Adams, [1949] SCR 407.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Kalamazoo Paper Company v Canadian Pacific Ry, [1950] SCR 356.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Sparrows Point v Vancouver (Greater) Water District, [1951] SCR 396.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dagmar Salen (The) v Chinook (The), [1951] SCR 608.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Patterson Steamships v Alcan, [1951] SCR 852.
Rand delivered for majority.
Canada v Nisbet Shipping Co Ltd, [1953] 1 SCR 480.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Colonial Steamships Ltd v Kurth Malting Co, [1954] SCR 275.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Goodwin Johnson Ltd v AT & B No 28 (The), [1954] SCR 513.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Gulf and Lake Navigation Co Ltd v Woodford (The), [1955] SCR
Rand concurred in the result.
Union Steamships Ltd v Barnes, [1956] SCR 842.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Monarch Towing & Trading Co Ltd v British Columbia Cement Co Ltd, [1957] SCR 816.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Anticosti Shipping Co v St-Amand, [1959] SCR 372.
Rand delivered for the court.
Statutory Duty
AL Patchett & Sons Ltd v Pacific Great Eastern Ry Co, [1959] SCR 271.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Statutory Law
Bell Telephone Company of Canada v Middlesex (county), [1947] SCR 1.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Reference re Jury Act (Alberta), [1947] SCR 213.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Jacques-Cartier (ville) v Lamarre, [1958] SCR 108.
Rand concurred in the result.
Taxation
Rogers-Majestic Corporation Limited v The Corporation of the City of Toronto, [1943] SCR 440.
Rand concurred in the result.
Vancouver (city) v AG of Canada and others, [1944] SCR 23.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Aluminum Co of Canada Ltd v Toronto (city), [1944] SCR 267.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Clough v Shefford (county), [1944] SCR 280.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada China Clay Ltd v Ontario (treasurer), [1945] SCR 87.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Congrégation du Très Saint Rédempteur v Aylmer (Town), [1945] SCR 685.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
St-Vital (Rural Municipality) v Winnipeg (City), [1946] SCR 101.
Rand concurred in the result.
Wm Wrigley Jr Co Ltd v Manitoba (treasurer), [1947] SCR 431.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
JW Windsor Company Ltd v Charlottetown (City), [1948] SCR 287.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Esquimalt and Nanaimo Ry Co v British Columbia (AG), [1948] SCR 403.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
British Columbia v Bridge River Power Co Ltd et al, [1949] SCR 246
Rand delivered dissenting opinion in part.
New Brunswick v Jones, [1950] SCR 286.
Rand for the court.
Sugar City (District) No 5 v Bennett & White Ltd, [1950] SCR 450.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Vancouver (city) v British Columbia Telephone Co, [1951] SCR 3.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Bathurst Parish Assessors v Canada, [1951] SCR 872.
Rand delivered for majority.
Canadian Pacific Ry v Winnipeg (city), [1952] 1 SCR 424.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dames Religieuse de Notre Dame de Charité du Bon Pasteur v Sunny Brae (town) Assessors, [1952] 2 SCR 76.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Robson v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), [1952] 2 SCR 223.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canadian Pacific Ry v Saskatchewan (AG), [1952] 2 SCR 231.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Independence Founders Ltd, [1953] 2 SCR 389.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Spruce Falls Powers & Paper Co, [1953] 2 SCR 407.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Goldsmith Bros. Smelting & Refining Co, [1954] SCR 55.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Dominion Taxicab Association v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1954] SCR 82.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Phillips v Sault Ste. Marie (city), [1954] SCR 404.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Mendelson, [1954] SCRv 422.
Rand concurred in the result.
Wilson v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1955] SCR 352.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Toronto (City) v Olympia Edward Recreation Club Ltd, [1955] SCR
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Firesonte tire & Rubber Co Ltd v Hamilton (city), [1955] SCR 604.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Home Oil Company Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1955] SCR 733.
Rand delivered for the court.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Trans-Canada Investment Corp Ltd, [1956] SCR 49.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Lord Nelson Hotel Co Ltd v Halifax (city), [1956] SCR 264.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co of Canada Ltd v T Eaton Co Ltd, [1956] SCR
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Canada (Minister of National Revenues) v Consolidated Glass Ltd, [1957] SCR 167.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Canadian Pacific Ry v Estavan (town), [1957] SCR 365.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Kool Vent Awning Ltd v R, [1957] SCR 617.
Rand concurred in the result.
FW Woolworth Co Ltd v British Columbia, [1957] SCR 738.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
London (City) v St. Thomas (City), [1958] SCR 249.
Rand concurred in the result.
Saint John (Municipality) v Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation, [1958] SCR 263.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Trans Mountain Oil Pipe Line Co v Jasper School District No 3063, [1958] SCR 349.
Rand delivered for the court.
Tort: Defamation
Douglas v Tucker, [1952] 1 SCR 275.
Rand concurred in the result.
Ross v Lamport, [1956] SCR 366.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lacarte v Toronto Board of Education, [1959] SCR 465.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Tort: False Imprisonment
Frey v Fedoruk, [1950] SCR 517.
Rand concurred in the result.
MacKenzie v Martin, [1954] SCR 361.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Beattie v Kozak, [1958] SCR 177.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Lamb v Benoît, [1959] SCR 321.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Tort: False Representation
Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Co v Maxim, [1946] SCR 604.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lortie v Bouchard, [1952] 1 SCR 508.
Rand concurred in the result.
Junkin v Bedard, [1958] SCR 56.
Rand concurred in the result.
Tort: Malicious Prosecution
Pickles v Barr, [1949] SCR 239.
Rand concurred in the result.
Lamb v Benoît, [1959] SCR 321.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Tort: Negligence
Ching v Canadian Pacific Railway Company, [1943] SCR 451.
Rand for the court.
Karas v Rowlett, [1944] SCR 1.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Bay-Front Garage Ltd v Evers, [1944] SCR 20.
Rand concurred in the result.
London & Lancashire Guarantee & Accident Co of Canada v La Cie FX Drolet, [1944] SCR 82.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Daigle v Albert, [1944] SCR 97.
Decision by the court.
Canadian Pacific Ry Co v Kizlyk Estate, [1944] SCR 98.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Murdock v O’sullivan, [1944] SCR 143.
Rand concurred in the result..
Martineau v Canada, [1944] SCR 194.
Rand concurred in the result.
Pacific Great Eastern Ry Co v Bridge River Power Co Ltd, [1944] SCR 196.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion as to part of counterclaim.
Canadian Breweries Transport Ltd v Toronto Transportation Commission, [1944] SCR 249.
Rand concurred in the result.
Boxenbaum v Wise, [1944] SCR 292.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Caron v Forgues, [1944] SCR 302.
Rand expresses no opinion.
Lister v McAnulty, [1944] SCR 317.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Gauthier Company Ltd v Canada, [1945] SCR 143.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Aga Heat (Canada) Ltd v Brockville Hotel Co, [1945] SCR 184.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
R v East Crest Oil Company Ltd, [1945] SCR 191.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
L V Wolfe & Sons v Giesbrecht, [1945] SCR 441.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Pacific Express Co v Levy, [1945] SCR 456.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canadian Pacific Ry Co v Rutherford, [1945] SCR 609.
Rand concurred in the result.
Gray Coach Lines Ltd v Payne, [1945] SCR 614.
Rand concurred in the result.
Oliver Blais Company Ltd v Yachuk, [1946] SCR 1.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canada v Anderson, [1946] SCR 129.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Laperrière; Canada v Dubeau, [1946] SCR 415.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion in part.
Union Packing Co Ltd v Canada, [1946] SCR 456.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Anthony, [1946] SCR 569.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lessard v Hull Electric Company, [1947] SCR 22.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canada v Canadian Pacific Ry Company, [1947] SCR 185.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Shell, [1947] SCR 219.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Telford v Secord, [1947] SCR 277.
Rand concurred in the result.
MacLoad v Roe, [1947] SCR421.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Brown v B and F Theatres Ltd, [1947] SCR 486.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Ouellet v Cloutier, [1947] SCR 521.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Charbonneau v Dubé, [1948] SCR 82.
Rand concurred in the result.
Theriault v Huctwith, [1948] SCR 86.
Rand concurred in the result.
Jones v Shafer Estate, [1948] SCR 166.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Shell Oil Company v Landry, [1948] SCR 275.
Rand concurred with Kellock.
Booth v St-Catherines (City), [1948] SCR 564.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Beaudin v Choquette, [1949] SCR 348.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Ware’s Taxi Ltd v Gilliham, [1949] SCR 637.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Kent v Bell, [1949] SCR 745.
Rand delivered for the court.
Canada v Moreau, [1950] SCR 18.
Rand concurred in the result.
Kalamazoo Paper Company. Canadian Pacific Ry, [1950] SCR 356.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Canada v Canada Steamship Lines et al, [1950] SCR 532.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Studer v Cowper, [1951] SCR 450.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Gilmour v Mossop, [1951] SCR 815.
Rand concurred in the result.
Cook v Lewis, [1951] SCR 830.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Parent v Lapointe, [1952] 1 SCR 376.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Vancouver General Hospital v Fraser Estate, [1952] 2 SCR 36.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
McArter v AE Hill Co Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 154.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Crown Diamond Paint Company, Ltd v Acadia Holding Realty Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 161.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Flaherty v Canadian National Ry Co, [1952] 2 SCR 299.
Rand concurred in the result.
Canada v Spence, [1952] 2 SCR 517.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Modern Motor Sales Ltd v Masoud, [1953] 1 SCR 149.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Canada v Nisbet Shipping Co Ltd, [1953] 1 SCR 480.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Salmon River Logging Company Ltd v Burt, [1953] 2 SCR117.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
MacDonald v Vancouver (city), [1953] 2 SCR 170.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Montreal Tramways Company v Deeks, [1953] 2 SCR
Rand concurred in the result.
Archibald v Nesting, [1953] 2 SCR 423.
Rand concurred in the result.
Swyrd v Tulloch, [1954] SCR 199.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Burrard Drydock Co Ltd v Kurth Malting Co, [1954] SCR 307.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Savage v Wilby, [1954] SCR 376.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Boileau v R, [1954] SCR 414.
Rand concurred in the result.
Goodwin Johnson Ltd v AT & B No 28 (The), [1954] SCR 513.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Alexander v Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Ry Co Ricker, [1954] SCR707.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Ottawa (City) v Munroe, [1954] SCR 756.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Bruce v McIntyre, [1955] SCR 251.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
British Columbia Electric Ry v Farrer, [1955] SCR 757.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Car and General Ins. Corp Ltd v Seymour, [1956] SCR 322.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Danis v Saumur, [1956] SCR 403.
Rand concurred in the result.
King v Colonial Homes Ltd, [1956] SCR 528.
Rand concurred in the result.
Noddin v Laskey, [1956] SCR 577.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Rintoul v X-Ray and Radium Industries Ltd, [1956] SCR 674.
Rand concurred in the result.
Brooks v Ward, [1956] SCR 683.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Union Steamships Ltd v Barnes, [1956] SCR 842.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Sylvester v Crits, [1956] SCR 991.
Rand delivered for the court.
Miller v Decker, [1957] SCR 625.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Joley v Marcoux, [1957] SCR 650.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Cleveland-Cliffs SS Co v R, [1957] SCR 810.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Monarch Towing & Trading Co Ltd v British Columbia Cement Co Ltd, [1957] SCR 816.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Lang v Pollard, [1957] SCR 858.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Bedard v Gauthier, [1958] SCR 92.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Brassard v Autobus & Taxis Ltee, [1958] SCR 237.
Rand concurred in the result.
Fagnan v Ure Estate, [1958] SCR 377.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Carriss v Buxton, [1958] SCR 441.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Hunt and W. Mayo v Macleod Construction Co Ltd, [1958] SCR 737.
Rand concurred in dissenting opinion.
Hillman v MacIntosh, [1959] SCR 384.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Fleming v Atkinson, [1959] SCR 513.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Tort: Nuisance
Crown Diamond Paint Company, Ltd v Acadia Holding Realty Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 161.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Hugh W Simmons Ltd v Foster, [1955] SCR 324.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Crown Diamond Paint Company, Ltd v Acadia Holding Realty Ltd, [1952] 2 SCR 161.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Tort: Wrongful Detention
Minaker v Minaker, [1949] SCR 397.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Wills & Estates
Mussen v Crown Trust Company, [1943] SCR 460.
Decision by the court.
Fortier v Miller, [1943] SCR 470
Rand concurred in the result.
Leger v Poirier, [1944] SCR 152.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Jean v Gagnon, [1944] SCR 175.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Sutherland Estate v Nicoll Estate, [1944] SCR 253.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Pouliot v Cloutier, [1944] SCR 284.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Saskatoon (city) v Shaw, [1945] SCR 42.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Thompson v Lampert, [1945] SCR 343.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Pahara v Pahara, [1946] SCR 89.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
O’Neil v Royal Trust Co and McClure, [1946] SCR 622.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Adam v Ouellette, [1947] SCR 283.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Berwick v Canada Trust Co, [1948] SCR 151.
Rand concurred in the result.
Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Canada, [1948] SCR 183.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Meyer v Meyer Estate, [1948] SCR 329.
Rand concurred in the result.
Gingras v Gingras, [1948] SCR 339.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Mckay Estate (Re), [1948] SCR 500.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Lunn v Barber, [1950] SCR 108.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Coulombe v Société Cooperative Agricole de Montmorency, [1950] SCR 313.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Bégin v Bilodeau, [1951] SCR 699.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Dansereau v Berget, [1951] SCR 822.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Langlais v Langlais, 1 [1952] SCR 28.
Rand delivered reasons for decision.
Stanley v Jardine Estate, [1952] 1 SCR 260.
Rand expresses no opinion.
Tzedeck v McIntyre Estate, [1953] 1 SCR 31.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Bernard v Amyot-Forget, [1953] 1 SCR 82.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Cox (Re), [1953] 1 SCR 94.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Robertson Estate v Robertson Estate, [1953] 2 SCR 1.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Fasken v Fasken Estate, [1953] 2 SCR 10.
Rand for the court.
Atkinson Estate v Ontario (Public Trustees), [1953] 2 SCR 41.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Neilsons v Neilson Estate, [1954] SCR 88.
Rand concurred in the result.
Loggie Estate v McCauley, [1954] SCR 645.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Deglman v Brunet Estate, [1954] SCR 725.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Beard v Barrett Estate, [1955] SCR 93.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Crawford Estate v Crawford, [1955] SCR 184.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Diocesan Synod of Fredericton v Hughson Estate, [1955] SCR 498.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Hooper Estate (Re), [1955] SCR 508.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.
Mathieu v Saint-Michel, [1956] SCR 477.
Rand delivered for the majority.
Montreal Trust Co v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1956] SCR 702.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Moore v Royal Trust Co, [1956] SCR 880.
Rand concurred in the result.
Kerslake Estate (Re), [1957] SCR 516.
Rand concurred in the result.
Edwards v Bradley, [1957] SCR 599.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Torrance Estate v Canada (Minister of National Revenues), [1958] SCR 146.
Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
Lahay v Brown Estate, [1958] SCR 240.
Rand delivered dissenting opinion.
Bennett v Manitoba (Official Guardian), [1958] SCR 392.
Whether letter constituted will. Rand delivered separate reasons for decision.
McEwen v Jenkins Estate, [1958] SCR 719.
Rand concurred in the result.
Pratt v Johnson, [1959] SCR 102.
Rand concurred in the dissenting opinion.